Ruben Perez wrote:
This is what I currently have. It's incomplete and will get some more work today:
https://github.com/anarthal/boost-cmake/tree/feature/cxx20-modules https://github.com/anarthal/config/tree/feature/cxx20-modules https://github.com/anarthal/assert/tree/feature/cxx20-modules https://github.com/anarthal/throw_exception/tree/feature/cxx20-modules https://github.com/anarthal/mp11/tree/feature/cxx20-modules https://github.com/anarthal/core/tree/feature/cxx20-modules
I don't think BOOST_CXX20_MODULE is the right name. Macros prefixed with BOOST_CXXnn_ indicate feature availability. The modules macro would be called BOOST_CXX20_NO_MODULES, because we use negative macros. (And BOOST_CXX23_NO_STD_MODULE, respectively.) What we need here is not an availability macro (are C++20 modules supported by the compiler?) but a user configuration macro (I want to use Boost as modules.) It should be something like BOOST_USE_MODULES, for instance.