On 18 Aug 2009, at 17:48, Rutger ter Borg wrote:
DE wrote:
by the way i asked a colleague of mine (who is familiar with matlab as well as c++) what syntax does he like more? and he said that he prefers c++ (regardles of performance) so my point is that it's a pure matter of taste
Guys, I've looked into GLAS a bit more. Please go read this document of last month,
http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~karlm/glas/tutorial.pdf
It supports everything discussed in this thread, and more! It is available on the Internet. It has a Boost community background. Let's stop reinventing the wheel at least three times.
Hah hah, I "Round" "Square" "Elliptical" "Pentagonal" -> Seriously, been done! http://bikehacks.com/china-bike- hack/ I'm just trying to stick my oar in to try and make sure scientists don't get left out in the cold by people developing scientific software... I take some exception to the 'emotional arguments' as the opposition to C++. If the C++ implementation isn't faster [one day I suspect it will be] -- ultimately why should they care? Thanks, -ed ------------------------------------------------ "No more boom and bust." -- Dr. J. G. Brown, 1997