21 Apr
2006
21 Apr
'06
2:53 p.m.
I think it is quite hard to require that a parser for config file X must exists for us to accept the library. It puts a great deal of burden on the library author. Our focus should be on the general core interface of the library s.t. we get a flexible solution that can be useful in many areas.
The requisites I meant were the ones enumerated, namely 1. The ability to load/save properties independently, not as a whole. 2. A documented (for library extensibility) parser interface allowing parser developers to accomplish (1). Sorry if this was not clear enough. Cheers Jorge