20 Aug
2008
20 Aug
'08
7:28 p.m.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
What is an "implicit requirement"? You mean that previous users of boost/throw_exception where remiss if they didn't derive from std::exception or if they didn't surround throw_exception with #if BOOST_NO_TYPEID.
The semantics of boost::throw_exception have not changed.
That's where we differ. It seems to me that on certain platforms things won't work as they had before.
If that's true, it's a bug and I'll fix it. Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode