5 May
2011
5 May
'11
2:19 p.m.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Robert Jones <robertgbjones@gmail.com> wrote:
Surely this could be used as an argument for pointers instead of optionals for every use of optional. Efficiency
No it can't. Boost Optional is necessary (and designed) for optional values returned by value.
taken to this extent seems like the wrong choice - surely we should write for clarity first and efficiency second, iff measurement suggests it's a problem.
Olaf