Hi Everyone,
I have just recorded the following message in the Mailing List.
sob., 14 wrz 2024 o 02:44 Alan de Freitas via Boost
- As people seem to imply, the WG21 issue goes way beyond the motivation behind the proposals or the difficulty behind the Boost review process. Not all Boost libraries are intended to go through WG21. Not all WG21 proposals would make good Boost libraries (like begin/end iterators for std::optional).
We are in the process of implementing the range interface for Boost.Optional, as proposed in P3168R2 https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3168r2.html and to the extent possible in C++11. I would like to hear opinions from the people in this list, on if and why this would be a bad idea. Regards, &rzej;