On 5/22/17 7:56 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Robert Ramey wrote:
And then there is Hana.
There'll always be Hana, I suppose.
mp11 is not quite a competitor to Hana. True, they both do metaprogramming. But mp11 is rather a replacement for the myriads of hand-rolled type-based metaprogramming primitives scattered all over people's code; it's like a collection of these same primitives, but done coherently and with an unified naming convention. (And with, I suppose, proper-ish documentation and a test suite.)
It pains me each time I see the same mp_wheel being reinvented, and each time the standard library acquires an ad-hoc, arbitrarily named, metaprogramming primitive. This has to end.
Right - I mean to suggest a strategy to achieve that. Robert Ramey.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost