30 Oct
2004
30 Oct
'04
4:08 a.m.
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 09:12:41 +0900, Darren Cook <darren@dcook.org> wrote:
- This opinion is probably not shared with others, but I'd prefer the library to be independent from the Boost Thread library. The dependency feels kind of the wrong way around. ... But a dependency on any thread library is likely to throw cold water on my use.
Same here.
There is no dependency on Boost.Threads unless BOOST_HAS_THREADS is defined. Is there a need for another option e.g. BOOST_LOG_HAS_THREADS that could be used to en/disable the dependency in *otherwise* multi-threaded code? -- Caleb Epstein caleb.epstein@gmail.com