AMDG On 03/23/2011 04:10 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
I will be doing that. Unfortunately except for you and John Maddock no one else has ever expressed an interest in TTI.
Well, let me express interest too.
Maybe that sort of metaprogramming is only of interest to other metaprogrammers and not normal end-users.
That's probably true. I don't need functionality like this often, but when I do need it, it's really important. The most common use case for me is to preserve backwards compatibility when concept requirments change. (For instance, BOOST_MPL_HAS_TEMPLATE_XXX was critical for implementing result_of support in Boost.Lambda.)
Which of course does not bode well for a review even though the library is quite good in the creator's opinion.
In Christ, Steven Watanabe