Re: [boost] [PQS] Vector/matrix library with mixed units vs. underlying data type

--- Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@wp.pl> wrote:

I have read you whole post, and I totally agree (it was an interesting example too!). I think there was a misunderstanding.

The problem is about underlying data type. Do we allow one field of a vector<3> to be double, another field to be int, and another field to be Boost.Rational ?

Please see my direct reply to Michael, titled "Re: [boost] [PQS] free_quantity contra int,double and Boost.Rational"

Ok, yes, I see the misunderstanding now. I agree - I don't see a need to mix the underlying numeric types. -- Leland __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com