I can't help myself bike shedding that clause 8 looks to have less complete no-liability.
"Except in the cases of wilful misconduct or damages directly caused to natural persons, the Licensor will in no event be liable..."
IANAL, but might look as though - If someone dies from a life-support software malfunction, the author is on the hook? (Damage to 'un-natural persons' are exempted I note ;-)
Wilful misconduct or damages directly caused to natural persons is better known as "a crime". Under EU law since about 2011 or so, it is illegal to disclaim liability for that under EU consumer protection law, and a licence or EULA or contract which does so is problematic and depending on how the rest of it is written, could be null and void. Indeed there was some past case law before the ECJ where the disclaimer of liabilities was rendered void, and a US multinational had to fork out a ton of cash far in excess of the contracted liability limit to some small European business. If you read the recommended practices guide for EU lawyers, it suggests to insert many separate and standalone disclaimers of liability with clear boundaries around specific things, and not to use broad brush disclaimers as is typical under US law. The EUPL is following that advice. But to answer your question, unless someone can prove that you deliberately made your software target directly specific people or a specific person, there is no liability in the above clause. Even if you wrote a virus which trashed people's stuff, unless it can be proved that you *deliberately* trashed people's stuff and it's not a programming error by you, you're fine. Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/