On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 12:59 PM John Maddock via Boost
On 01/08/2024 13:12, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
Here are what we believe to be the available options.
1.
The C++ Alliance assumes control of the Boost assets, including the boost.org domain name. The Boost Foundation becomes uninvolved in any decisions related to the Boost Libraries. 2.
The Boost Foundation continues to be the stewards of the boost.org domain name and related assets. New assets that are meant to be associated with the Boost Libraries are transferred to the Boost Foundation. In any matters related to the Boost Libraries, the Board will abide by any decisions made by the developers but will no longer vote themselves on issues as they relate to the Boost Libraries unless there truly is no clear consensus or path forward. I'm probably not going to be helpful, but I don't really like either of
On 7/31/24 23:11, Kristen Shaker via Boost wrote: the options, with the first one being slightly less preferable.
Exactly, it's sort of like asking a panel of folks who don't know each other (the developers) to conduct a job interview with two applicants they also don't know. Expect an entirely random answer!
Interesting analogy and perspective. That suggests that a review process, as suggested elsewhere, for the developers to make a choice is the way to go. Where it would allow the applicants to promote their vita. -- -- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell -- Don't Assume Anything -- No Supone Nada -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net