Re: [boost] Proposed boost timers library implementation concerns.

It looks a bit overkill because when you use QPC you usually want high precision... all those other calls would be a pretty huge overhead not to mention that without threading we'd require the user to type tmr.update() periodically. I suggest we let the user find the appropriate fix, but I'll add this issue in the documentation.

Actually I realised I could simply check that the values are correct by checking with GetTickCount() each time I call QueryPerformanceCounter()... now the question is what would happen... should I throw an exception ? unlikely... should I set some flag to LEAP_DETECTED ? should I just take GetTickCount()'s time silently ? Philippe