6 Aug
2011
6 Aug
'11
2:50 a.m.
2011/8/6 Michel MORIN <mimomorin@gmail.com>:
Scott McMurray wrote:
Can we do this with move semantics instead?
Partially yes. But, partially no: when using stack-based allocator (or stack-based container as the underlying implementation of flat_* containers), the overhead of `move` is non-negligible.
I meant, "the overhead of move-construct is non-negligible." Regards, Michel