John, thanks for your reply (and thanks to everyone else who replied, too). On 12/12/2009 12:02 PM, John Maddock wrote:
Is this really a minimal subset to use boost.python ? I can't quite believe it. In particular, what is boost.mpi doing there, and what boost.serialization (and boost.spirit) ?
OK, there are two issue here... why is the dependency so "fat", and why is component X a dependency of Y?
OK. I think I can see how I got where I am. My point is that this 'bcp' tool is an insufficient tool for the purpose, as it, despite its purpose, reinforces the idea that boost is really huge and (almost) monolithic. I understand that boost.python depends on boost.graph. And I can see that (some of) boost.graph may depend on (some of) mpi, etc. Thus, tracking dependencies on the component level isn't quite enough, if I end up with a huge dependency tree. I do want to use all of boost.python, but I definitely have no need for serialization or mpi. Thanks, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...