
2 Dec
2004
2 Dec
'04
5:17 a.m.
Joel de Guzman wrote:
I've been wanting to ask this before: Shouldn't this be spelled: BOOST_FOR_EACH?
Sure, if that's what people prefer. It's only BOOST_FOREACH because it is approximating the "foreach" keyword that some languages have, which might serve to emphasize that it works like a new keyword and not like an STL algorithm. It's also one less character. But those are both exceedingly lame reasons. I don't care either way. -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com