Re: [boost] different matrix library?

on 18.08.2009 at 20:28 joel wrote :

...

it seems reasonable but it can be implemented through non-member function and still be readable even more readable acually

set(m, list(x, y), val);

or even

set(m, list(x, y)) = val how can this be more readable than m(x,y) = val ???

set(m)(x, y) = val;//? no? -- Pavel