2 May
2011
2 May
'11
2:26 p.m.
Mathias Gaunard-2 wrote:
On 03/04/2011 21:44, Vicente BOTET wrote:
I guess that this benchmark shows a hard limitation of Boost.Local at least until most of the compilers will accept local structures as template parameters.
Don't all of them do it already, at least in C++0x mode?
I think so (that's the case at least in my experience). Here is the accepted C++0x proposal that allows to pass local (and unnamed) types as template parameters: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2657.htm --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/local-Help-for-the-Alternatives-section-t... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.