-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Seefeld Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:38 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] temp file
Dylan Trotter wrote:
I think the most important case involves a completely opaque temp file. You can perform stream operations on it and share it within a process but have no access to the filesystem specific information (i.e. its filename).
Agree or disagree?
I'm not sure about the ordering according to importance. It doesn't matter which is more important, as long as they are all supported (where 'all' is may be three or four different scenarios).
Regards, Stefan
I agree with Stefan. I guess, there isn't enough information (and possibly will never) to rank the use cases. For example, in my case, having a temp file in the file system is the most useful case as I need to transfer temp files across processes. --Suman
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost