18 Sep
2013
18 Sep
'13
12:23 p.m.
On 17 September 2013 20:28, Marc Glisse
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, T. Raykoff wrote:
OK. I just officialy gave up on CGAL.
It is between b::p and that c++/Delphi clipper library.
Note that it could be useful for all 3 libraries if you explained what made you chose/reject them.
I'd also be interested in learning about Taavo's reasons. I believe other Boost.Polygon (as well as Boost.Geometry) users would be interested in any sort of comparisons with other geometry libraries, so it's valid question indeed. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net "Participation in this whole process is a form of torture" ~~ Szalony