Den 07-10-2010 18:27, vicente.botet skrev:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Kawulak"<robert.kawulak@gmail.com> To:<boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:45 AM Subject: Re: [boost] [constrained_value] Constrained Value review results
From: Paul A. Bristow I also like the word 'static' - it implies 'fixed at compile time' to me, but I agree static has other possible implications.
How about "statically_bounded"?
+1. But I prefer static_bounded that follows the existing static_log2, static_gcd, ... in Boost.Math.
I'm not awfully happy with the names suggested so far. At the outset boost::constrained_value::bounded<int> is a good name. Now, since the bounds, /not the actualy bounding/, can be configured either at compiler-time or run-time, we need some way of saying this. What about namespaces? boost::constrained_values::run_time_bounds::bounded<int> boost::constrained_values::compile_time_bounds::bounded<int> ? Or boost::constrained_values::static_bounds::bounded<int> boost::constrained_values::dynamic_bounds::bounded<int> ? -Thorsten