9 May
2006
9 May
'06
5:02 p.m.
"David Abrahams" wrote
"Arkadiy Vertleyb" wrote
result_of<minus_(int, _1_)>::type f = 3 - _1;
Does this direction make sense?
Any particular reason why BOOST_TYPEOF is not an option?
It requires type registration, whereas this approach should not. That's the only reason.
FWIW I would prefer to live with BOOST_TYPEOF and type registration. I have no doubt that registration will have its problems but only by familiarity will they be solved. Anyway somebody already proposed a similar looking alternative on comp.std.c++: http://tinyurl.com/gc7wn but with no response. Of course then, the proposer was ahead of his time. Now, BOOST_TYPEOF makes this functionality redundant regards Andy Little