
17 Aug
2006
17 Aug
'06
12:14 p.m.
Johan RĂ¥de <rade <at> maths.lth.se> writes:
Output is consistent with C99. (In particular, negative NaN is written as "-nan".
Paris (U.E.), le 17/08/2006 Bonjour *Negative* Not-A-Number? What is such a beast, and what should it be used for? Next, I vote for an Octonionic Not-A-Number! And I definitely want a notation for the elements of the Stone-Chech compactification of a set which are not in the base set... ;-) Merci Hubert Holin