10 Dec
2004
10 Dec
'04
10:19 a.m.
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 03:50:58 -0700, Larry Evans <cppljevans@cox-internet.com> wrote:
On 12/10/2004 03:25 AM, Larry Evans wrote:
where the problem with typedef's is mentioned as the show-stopper.
Actually, Rani Sharoni's post in that thread is the best explanation I've seen to date.
Still, the problem in his post applies to typedefs. If A<T>::B is a nested class or struct under A<T>, and not a typedef, deduction should always be possible. In the case where B is a typedef: typedef typename some_class<T> B; you can deduce some_class<T> instead of A<T>::B Peder
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost