On Apr 19, 2013 4:10 AM, "Michael Marcin"
Is the library to be built upon a specific physics library (PhysX for instance) by utilizing existing code in the respective SDK to abstract away much of the object management?
That seems like one workable option.
Or is it meant to be built from the ground up to create generic objects, which can then be translated into an arbitrary format for an existing library?
I'm not sure what this means.
Thank-you. I was primary confused as to whether or not a specific library would be targeted, since doing so would mean a separate project for each physics platform (if more than one were desired). I suppose I was overthinking things. For the second option, I meant a group of objects and methods generic enough to be replicated in any popular physics library. In this case, there would be a system to take this code (almost like pseudocode) and translate it to an existing physics library format. I have completed a draft proposal and would appreciate some feedback: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7xhha0a3ahk5p6r/preston_hamlin_gsoc_proposal_draft... Many thanks, -Preston