23 May
2004
23 May
'04
6:30 a.m.
"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy@meta-comm.com> writes:
I think I'm becoming comfortable with the idea. It does complicate things, however. For instance, now the library author would have to look into twice as much reports to determine the state of her library (superseding the old "torture" results with the new "basic" ones would make the whole thing useless).
A really slick system would integrate weekly and daily results into one table, but as you said, it gets complicated somewhere. In this case, it's in the results processing. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com