On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:54:17PM +0100, Domagoj Saric wrote:
"Lars Viklund" <zao@acc.umu.se> wrote in message news:20101104112534.GN22859@hatchepsut.acc.umu.se...
All tests that shall pass pass, and the two that shall fail fail on 5.9 and 5.10 with r66387 and r66395.
vacpp results are surprisingly good on r66395, log attached. It fails just two tests unexpectedly, lib_function_test and function_n_test.
Ah, the dreaded 'ampersandless' plain function pointer assignment...this wrecks havoc on most compilers (including latest MSVC and Clang)... ...I've pretty much refactored the relevant code...try the new version and let me know if it helped...
ps. if you can, please also run tests for signals, signals2 and program_options (these sometimes caught what the dedicated ones did not)...
r66407 has the correct pass/failed-as-expected results on VisualAge. All three test suites of program_options, signals and signals2 pass. I ran the same three suites on Sun as well, just to cover all bases. On 5.10, signals and signals2 pass completely, except for the usual spurious mutex_test failure as indicated in the regression matrix. program_options on 5.9 fails to compile parsers.o in a similar manner to the one reported in the regular trunk test matrix, so it's most probably not a Function fault (log attached). Hooray! -- Lars Viklund | zao@acc.umu.se