28 Feb
2006
28 Feb
'06
7:52 a.m.
On 2/27/06, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga@gmail.com> wrote:
named_shared_memory named_mapped_file named_heap_memory etc.
Some users have suggested more descriptive names:
objects_in_shared_memory objects_in_mapped_file objects_in_heap_memory objects_in_user_memory I don't exactly understand where plural form cames from. Isn't, for example, current named_shared_object references _single_ shared memory block?
-- Best regards, Zigmar