Alexander Nasonov wrote:
-- David Abrahams wrote:
Alexander,
If you want to convince people that your idea is useful it would be a good idea to make it easier for them to understand why. While I understand everything you've written above, I still don't know why I'd want this, and I'm not prepared to reverse-engineer an example FSM implementation to find out.
I don't know what do you mean exactly but I'm not yet going to convince people to use it because I'm in the middle of switching it from old interface to MPL set style.
What I would like to know is why you want to represent overload sets as compile-time collections: what sort of computations can you do with them in practice? I'm not expressing any scepticism that it's useful, I just want more information. Jonathan