2 Oct
2008
2 Oct
'08
10:37 p.m.
Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
Joel de Guzman wrote:
Yep, I'm keeping the behavior of protect, not unlambda. As I mentioned in my other post. val(_1 < _2) can probably be the unlambda behavior.
I don't think it's a good idea to overload val like this, giving it two different unrelated meanings.
I think you're probably right. For example, I use: val(_1) to convert the referene into a val. So, agreed. It does not make sense to overload the meaning of val. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net