9 Feb
2007
9 Feb
'07
10:48 a.m.
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
I support this aggresive deadline-based approach and very much appreciate your efforts to get Boost 1.34 out of the door, we've just been procrastinating way too long. Hopefully, the planned post-1.34 switch to SVN and Beman's always-ready approach to code base management will avoid these problems in the future.
In principle I agree. Where I do not agree is the fact that we currently do not have a single gcc (mingw/cygwin) regression result. I think it would be a fault if boost is omitting such a mainstream compiler! Roland