At Friday 2004-11-05 02:29, you wrote:
John Torjo wrote:
Finally, have had some time to update the logging lib. Get it from: http://www.torjo.com/ (of course, it comes packed with docs)
Just a quick thought that came to my mind...
Did you consider using the syntax 'BOOST_LOG(dbg, "message" << foobar);' instead of 'BOOST_LOG(dbg) << "message" << foobar;'?
While I think the syntax you use looks far nicer, we ususally need the ability to be able to compile away the logging calls completely and this only can be done with the first form.
a point considered in detail in "Effecient C++" by Bulka & Mayhew
Markus
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"