Re: [boost] [unordered] Visual C++ 2013 initializer_listoverloadfailure.

5 Nov 2013


      Stephan, I seem to recall providing a slightly similar example that
you added as repro to DevDiv#532674 when you renamed it "[Milan]
initializer_list overloading" on 2012/11/29.

Glen

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Daniel James  wrote:
...
On 5 November 2013 16:32, Stephan T. Lavavej  wrote:
...
I need a self-contained repro in order to file a compiler bug. I am aware of DevDiv#796414 "Overloading op+=(char) and op+=(initializer_list<char>) should be unambiguous" which is still active.
This is the example from the start of the thread which was confirmed
to fail on Visual C++. I don't know how to find out about
"DevDiv#796414" so I don't know if it's the same issue.
#include 
#include <string>
template <typename T>
struct thing
{
    void insert(T const&) {}
    void insert(T&&) {}
    void insert(std::initializer_list<T>) {}
};
int main() {
    thingstd::string x;
    x.insert("a");
    x.insert({"a"});
    x.insert({"a", "b"});
}
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Re: [boost] [unordered] Visual C++ 2013 initializer_listoverloadfailure.

Glen Fernandes