----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Williams" <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 5:58 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Futures Review -- Where we are with the Futures review?
"vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> writes:
Futures Review Starts Today - January 5, 2009
Where we are with the Futures review?
Good question. It was supposed to be over by now, but there's been no statement from Tom.
There was not too much reviews, neither responses from the authors, ... What happened?
Sorry for not taking the time to respond to all your comments. They are much appreciated. Maybe the lack of reviews indicates a lack of interest from the Boost community? That's a shame, if so.
Could you try to respond now. I'll realy appreciate.
Nevertheless, I'm sure that this library is essential to the construction of high level concurrent libraries.
If you want to include my code (or something derived from it) in your interthreads library, or Oliver wants to include it with his threadpool submission, that's fine by me.
Thanks for the offert. But it will be realy a shame to don't have a Future library in Boost. Even if Olivier or me included it on his library futures mast be first class in Boost. Regards, Vicente