Rob Stewart wrote:
From: "David B. Held" <dheld@codelogicconsulting.com>
One thing I would like to say is, my only reluctance on the part of some of the logos is that while they are quite beautiful, they have too many colors to know what they would look like as a small icon.
While there is mention of optionally supply iconic versions of the submitted logo, suitability to an icon was not part of the requirements. Is it fair to change the requirements now, especially given that there is a prize waiting for the winner?
(You can certainly vote with icons in mind if you like, but that doesn't make it fair.)
Well, I'm not stating it as a requirement. I'm stating it as my personal preference. And the whole question of "fairness" in voting is a can of worms that we probably don't want to get into. Doubtless other people feel differently about the logos than I do and will reflect that in their own vote. Dave