[boost] Re: true64cxx regresion reports

Fernando Cacciola wrote:

While adding failure markups, I noticed that the Optional library is shown as failing with true64cxx. However, looking at the error I can see that it is using an older version of the library (one which indeed is defective)

I just uploaded a new regression run. All tests are passing now for tru64cxx65.

I'm also seeing similar results for this toolset and the Numeric Conversion Library

There is on failure left in the numeric conversion library. Is that what you would expect? Markus