[boost] Re: indirecter_unary, indirecter_binary

Pavel Chikulaev wrote:

Now std::sort(vec.begin(), vec.end(), std::less<int>()) won't work.

No, why should it? It's a collection of pointers to int, not of int.

But I can do it with Boost::Bind: std::sort(vec.begin(), vec.end(), boost::bind(std::less<int>(), *_1, *_2));

This looks new to me. What exactly does this do? Sort the container of pointers by applying std::less to the pointees?

Boost::Bind's solution is much better that yours, because it constists indirector_unary, indirector_binary, indirector_ternary and so on.

Pavel Chikulaev

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

-- Matthias Kaeppler