Jeff Garland wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 11:54:42 -0700, Jonathan Turkanis wrote
David Abrahams wrote:
If I have to choose, then, I would much rather use the namespace io and move the library back to boost/io than use the namespace iostreams.
You don't _have_ to choose, but then you could do better than the status quo.
Okay, I'll hold off adding iostreams to CVS while I think about it some more.
Sorry, still catching up on holiday email. Did a decision get made on this yet? Because I'd really hate to see the last conclusion: 'holding off on adding iostreams'.
What I meant was I'd think about it some more before adding the library... I've now thought about it, and decided to use directory and namespace iostreams. So I will added it shortly. (I don't think there will be many problems porting iostreams, since I've already tested it on most of the supported platforms) Jonathan