On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Giovanni Piero Deretta <gpderetta@gmail.com> wrote:
[sorry for dropping in the conversation, but I love these games of play-with-syntax]
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Emil Dotchevski <emildotchevski@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Joel Falcou <joel.falcou@lri.fr> wrote:
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
By overloading generically, I mean the way other operators are overloaded in (Boost) LA: they're namespace-scope functions that kick-in for any conforming user-defined vector or matrix type.
Oh yeah OK i see it now. What about:
at(v, (_2,_1,-_3)) = xxx ; ?
Perhaps at<2,1,-3>(v) = xxx
That would lose the convenience of ADL
Not a problem, since the convenience of ADL is lost already. :) The operator overloads require the user to use "using" anyway; like those overloads, at<> would use SFINAE so it won't clash with anything the user may have defined. I'm pretty sure I've never used "use" so many times in a single sentence :) Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode