-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Vladimir Prus
The problem is that the current regression reporting tools don't count warnings (previous version use to), so there's nothing nagging developers about warnings introduced in their code.
If you treat warnings as errors
Fine we me, but not necessary fine with everybody ;-). And I suspect Boost.Build's warnings-as-errors=on work only with few compilers. But few is better than none.
I don't see why it wouldn't be (after the warnings have been quieted.) Can anyone see why? I know atleast the serialization library wants to ignore the "no virtual destructor" warning, but explicitly ignoring the warnings are par for the course providing you've investigated it (I think Robert R. has.) Thanks, Sohail