Simon Buchan wrote:
Rene Rivera wrote:
Simon Buchan wrote:
What's wrong with GCC 4?
It doesn't exist in MinGW form yet, not even in beta. So it would be wrong of me to assume that it will have the same support.
I compiled proper GNU GCC 4.0.0, and just installed over my MinGW precompiled package (after backing up, of course :D), so it just uses the same headers (exluding GNU's of course, no problems yet). I'm pretty sure the MS __int64 ext. is a GCC thing, not a MinGW thing. Im just guessing, though, since this is my work computer. Still, I _seriously_ doubt that the MinGW guys (and/or girls?) will pull any of those in future releases.
Well one data point is enough in this case. Since I first leaned toward making the assumption in the first place. So back to the original patch. Doug? John? Bronek? Is it OK? I guess eventually I'll assume the answer is yes ;-) -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org