Barend Gehrels wrote:
Hi Thomas,
The bottom line is that when the OGC conventions already force me to accept confusing names, it would at least be nice to know how I can verify that these are indeed OGC names. What are the reference documents I have to read to learn this?
There is a new table here: http://trac.osgeo.org/ggl/wiki/OGC which summarizes which is OGC and which is not, and clarify names and possible name changes.
Barend, In the section "OGC functions, not planned", it lists functions like X, Y, Z, and M but actually it might be valid to consider those accessors get<D> and set<D> as equivalents (for D in range [0, 3]) In other words, I would consider that GGL does provide some sort of equivalent of these four OGC functions. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org