El 01/08/2024 a las 20:07, Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost escribió:
El 31/07/2024 a las 22:11, Kristen Shaker via Boost escribió:
There was some discussion about the assets being held in a third party non profit controlled by a subset of the Boost Developers. However, given that there are already many Boost Developers on the Boost Foundation Board of Directors, we don’t see this as a meaningful deviation from the status quo.
I think that your argument that a potential third party controlled by a subset of the Boost Developers is not meaningfully different to the Boost Foundation is incorrect:
[...]
Hi Joaquín, Just to try to clarify a bit the "third option" that John and you are mentioning (and think some other have also suggested), as I understand it: - A new non-profit entity - Controlled by a subset of active and prominent Boost Developers (e.g. those should be the overwhelming majority of the board) - An entity whose primary (unique?) purpose is to support the Boost libraries (no additional projects, no conferences, etc.). Is this an accurate description of the "third option"? If so, I agree that this is a substantial deviation from the status quo. If other boost developers find this meaningfully different, then this option should definitely be available. Best, Ion