11 May
2005
11 May
'05
7:30 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
Anyway, I'm inclined that we not try to do this by-value return thing. Your thoughts?
Still would like to hear them.
I agree. I think the current system is good enough.
Also:
1. for the lazy case we should probably use result_of<F()>::type on the compilers that support it?
Yeah.
2. We probably also need lazy_binding<p, k, f>::type, right?
Now done.
Great! -- Daniel Wallin