21 Nov
2008
21 Nov
'08
2:58 p.m.
Markus Werle wrote:
[Sidenote: I'd prefer boost::spirit to stay as it is and spirit2c be renamed to boost::ultimate_parser, since it is a *completely* *different* library.]
I think the same has to be said for boost as a whole. As there is no guarantee to make two subsequent boost versions compatible with each other, I think it is only fair to consider them two distinct products. As unfortunate as that is for us users, it's the reality we have to face. Regards, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...