[boost] [inspect] added new check for C-style assert macro (was: [property_tree][showstopper][1.45] missing include in string_path.hpp)

On 11/11/2010 3:49 PM, Sebastian Redl wrote:

On 11.11.2010, at 21:38, Eric Niebler wrote:

...

If BOOST_ASSERT is *always* to be preferred over C's assert macro, then we should probably add that to the inspection report, right?

That would probably a good idea.

I just modified the inspect tool to check for the presence of C-style assert in Boost code. Everybody should be using BOOST_ASSERT. (Right?) Here's the result of running the new check over Boost trunk: http://pastebin.com/NttTw3BJ Beman, the inspection report looks like it was last run in June. What's up? http://boost.cowic.de/rc/inspect-trunk.html -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com