
18 Jan
2007
18 Jan
'07
2:50 p.m.
Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
"Boris Gubenko" <Boris.Gubenko@hp.com> wrote
This is a simple change in explicit-failures-markup.xml. The question is, should we (are we allowed to at this point) apply a change that is not related to a release compiler?
Fixes to explicit-failures-markup are OK for all compilers. That being said I ask everybody not to take unnecessary risks. The designation "release compiler" mostly means that we'll hold the release for regressions. Thomas
Regards, Arkadiy
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org