Re: [boost] [unordered] Visual C++ 2013 initializer_listoverloadfailure.

On 5 November 2013 16:32, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:

I need a self-contained repro in order to file a compiler bug. I am aware of DevDiv#796414 "Overloading op+=(char) and op+=(initializer_list<char>) should be unambiguous" which is still active.

This is the example from the start of the thread which was confirmed to fail on Visual C++. I don't know how to find out about "DevDiv#796414" so I don't know if it's the same issue. #include #include <string> template <typename T> struct thing { void insert(T const&) {} void insert(T&&) {} void insert(std::initializer_list<T>) {} }; int main() { thingstd::string x; x.insert("a"); x.insert({"a"}); x.insert({"a", "b"}); }