- Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

Boost Phoenix 3.0.1 - version numbers and ChangeLog
by Fletcher, John P 31 Jan '14

31 Jan '14

Boost Phoenix 3.0.1 is now on master. I am fixing the bugs previously reported for Boost Phoenix. I have started a file libs/phoenix/ChangeLog (following the example in wave) to log changes made. I am incrementing the lowest number of the version when I merge changes to master and origin/master and also changing the version number in Phoenix and reporting this in the ChangeLog. I hope this will make it easier in the future to keep track of exactly which version it is which is causing a problem. I would welcome any comments on the TODO list in the ChangeLog, in particular where there are problems caused by phoenix for other libraries. I am aware that this applies to boost/log. I am hopeful that some fixes of early bug reports will help with later bugs as well. I have just fixed 5715 which related to the comma operator in statement blocks, and can be fixed with the addition of a header. This fixes a silent error in the execution as compared with phoenix V2 and may well fix other problems. That fix is still in develop and not master until some tests have been done. John Fletcher

1 0

Ownership of tickets for Boost Phoenix
by Fletcher, John P 31 Jan '14

31 Jan '14

I have taken over as maintainer of Boost Phoenix and have started to fix the reported bugs. How do I get to be the owner of the bugs so that I can change their status when they have been fixed and tested? Also how can I be sure to get notification of new bug reports? John Fletcher

1 0

[program_options] documentation for validators
by Alain Miniussi 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

Hi, I have a question regarding the validators namespace of program_options documentation. That namespace is referenced in the tutorial in http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/doc/html/program_options/howto.html and some of its functions are used but there is no documentation related with that namespace. Actually, it does not even appears in the reference manual of the lib. Is that intended ? Regards Alain

2 1

[spirit.lex] 9580
by Vyacheslav Andrejev 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

Hi All, Can somebody take a look at bug #9580? It's a C++ puzzle. Two as if equivalent expressions demonstrate different behavior. This one auto expr = (this->self("SOME_STATE") += someTokenDef); calls boost::proto::detail::exprns_::operator +=. However this auto lex_def = this->self("SOME_STATE"); auto expr = (lex_def += someTokenDef); calls boost::spirit::lex::detail::operator +=. My guess is that it changes templates instantiaon order, but still I can't explain it and thus can't fix it. -- -- Vyacheslav Andrejev

2 3

Help please with Boost Discussion Policy
by Fletcher, John P 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

It has been pointed out to me that I need to change my habits from top posting to be conformant to the Boost Discussion Policy http://www.boost.org/community/policy.html I accept this fully and I am seeking some guidance how to achieve this. At my place of work our email client is Microsoft Outlook 2010 and the normal practice is top posting. When I am at home I can access the same system via a web email client which does the same thing. The Boost policy document reffers to Quote-Fix (http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ ) which was last updated in 2006 and does not work with current versions of Outlook. There is also this: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/macros4outlook/index.php?title=QuoteF… I am doing most of my Boost work from home and want to be able to communicate freely. Ideally what I want to do is to switch between the styles so that only my Boost and related work is in quoted style. Any help will be much appreciated. Thank you John Fletcher

11 15

[config] Removing support for old compilers: do we have a consensus yet?
by John Maddock 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

Folks, As you know Boost.Config has had it's support for old compilers stripped out, and this is a controversial change. We're now at the point where I'd really like to get the routine changes/updates into release, but to do that we need a final decision on whether to keep (and release) Steven Kelly's changes in develop. So do we have a final decision? Thanks, John.

6 8

[fusion] preprocess target pull request
by Eric Niebler 29 Jan '14

29 Jan '14

https://github.com/boostorg/fusion/pull/1 I'm not sure who gets notified of pull requests, if anybody. Sending mail for good measure. -- Eric Niebler Boost.org http://www.boost.org

6 14

[offtopic] C++Now 2014 - hotel room available
by Hartmut Kaiser 29 Jan '14

29 Jan '14

I apologize for posting off-topic. Hey all, Unfortunately I will not be able to come to C++Now this year. However I already booked my hotel room at the Aspen Meadows (at the early bird rate!). If anybody is interested in using the hotel reservation, please get in contact with me offline. Thanks! Regards Hartmut --------------- http://boost-spirit.com http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu

2 1

[git][predef] Pull fails
by Andrey Semashev 27 Jan '14

27 Jan '14

Hi, I checked out Boost on my Windows machine quite some time ago and today I tried to update it. I did: git submodule foreach git checkout develop git submodule foreach git pull The last command failed on Boost.Predef (log attached). I did not change it and I don't understand why there is conflict. I tried 'git reset --hard' and pull again, but it fails again the same way. How can I fix it?

7 10

Re: [boost] Interest in Base2/16/32/64 Encoding Library?
by PB 27 Jan '14

27 Jan '14

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Thomas Kemmer <tkemmer(a)computer.org> wrote: > Dear Boost Developers, > > I would like to know if there is interest in incorporating a generic > Base2/16/32/64 encoding library into Boost. > > I am the author of such a libray, hosted at > > http://code.google.com/p/stlencoders/ > > and would be willing to contribute and make the effort of > "Boostifying" it, if the Boost community is interested in such a > thing. > > There have been several suggestions for a Base64 encoding library on > this mailing list in the past. Most of them have been dismissed, since > Boost already provides a Base64 implementation with > Boost.Serialization's "Dataflow Iterators". Though I appreciate the > dataflow iterator's design, from personal experience I think that for > the basic task of encoding/decoding, a higher-level interface, e.g. > one that takes padding and intermittent whitespace (MIME) into > account, would benefit many developers. > > Currently, the stlencoders library > > - implements the Base16, Base32 and Base64 encoding schemes as defined > in RFC 4648. Base2, i.e. binary encoding, is also supported. > - implements encoding and decoding operations as generic algorithms > that operate on STL-style iterators > - supports different encoding alphabets using custom traits classes > - supports different character types > - lets the user define if/which non-alphabet characters should be > ignored via predicates > - provides reasonable performance that matches most "plain C" > implementations > > stlencoders is currently designed as a stand-alone library with no > dependencies on Boost (or anything but C++03); it would therefore take > some effort and guidance from the community to properly integrate it > with the rest of Boost. I would therefore appreciate any feedback > regarding your interest in this. > > Kind Regards, > > Thomas > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost > I know this was over a year ago, but I need to do some base64 encoding/decoding and wish Boost offered it at the outer level (as opposed to using internals of a library). Regards, Pete

1 0

Boost candidate similar to asyncplusplus
by Rodrigo Madera 27 Jan '14

27 Jan '14

Hello, I was wondering if there is anything similar to asyncplusplus [1] here in Boost land. I just found out about the library and I specially liked the task chaining syntax [2]: --- async::spawn([] { return 42; }).then([](int result) { return result; }).then([](task<int> parent) { std::cout << parent.get() << std::endl; }); --- This is something I would love to see in Boost. So I ask: 1) Are there any similar Boost candidates for task scheduling? 2) If not, is ASIO up to this with some adaptation? I felt specially inclined to ask this here because of all the discussion taking place over the recently reviewed Fibers library and the fundamentals of asynchronous processing. Very interesting thoughts being discussed there. And something more higher level (but not necessarily IO bound) might be helpful. Best regards, Rodrigo Madera [1] https://github.com/Amanieu/asyncplusplus [2] https://github.com/Amanieu/asyncplusplus/wiki/Tutorial

4 4

[github] boostorg/boost not listed?
by Joaquin M Lopez Munoz 26 Jan '14

26 Jan '14

Hi, After some recent aesthetic changes to https://github.com/boostorg , the repository boostorg/boost does not get listed in either of https://github.com/boostorg https://github.com/boostorg?page=2 https://github.com/boostorg?page=3 https://github.com/boostorg?page=4 https://github.com/boostorg?page=5 https://github.com/boostorg?page=6 even though it certainly exists and can be searched and found through the "Find a repository..." editbox. Before these latest changes to the web, boostorg/boost usualliy appeared #1 in the list as it quickly autoupdated after any subproject did. Thank you, Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica Digital

2 1

[atomic] Probable documentation issue: how do we know atomic is safe and/or efficient?
by John Maddock 26 Jan '14

26 Jan '14

I'm looking to use Boost.Atomic for the double-checked-locking-idiom, but I'm having trouble discovering a) Whether the library is correctly implemented. b) How efficient (or otherwise) the library is on various platforms. I'm sure the answer to (a) is that it is correct, but I was surprised that atomic<int> relied on the volatile modifier for thread safe load/stores on MSVC, I had assumed that something more than that would have been required, but I know I'm out of date on this stuff! I can't help thinking that questions like this could be allayed by better documentation - specifically what operations are used to ensure correctness on each supported platform, plus rationale and/or link to reference material. My apologies if this has been covered already in the review, and I realize that documentation is a lot of work, but I can see no way to ensure correctness other than through code inspection, so proper documentation is essential in that case. Regards, John.

5 10

[predef] Suggestion for Boost itself to start using this.
by Fletcher, John P 25 Jan '14

25 Jan '14

I have started to use the Boost predef library. I think it will be a good idea for this to be used within Boost. This is actually contained in the Future Work section of the Boost predef manual. http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/libs/predef/doc/html/predef/introducti… * And obviously there's lots of work to do in reformulating the existing Boost libraries to use the Predef library once it's accepted. I have been attempting to make use of it and one of the problems is that BOOST_VERSION itself is not consistent with it. It would I think break a lot of existing code to change BOOST_VERSION. Instead I suggest having another define a longside it which is consistent with Boost predef. I wnt to make the following suggestions to go into the definition of the version. First check that the version of Boost is recent enough. 1.55.0 is the first to have Boost predef. #include <boost/version.hpp> #if BOOST_VERSION >= 105500 #include <boost/predef.h> #define BOOST_HAVE_BOOST_PREDEF #endif #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <sstream> Then if that is true then construct a new defintion: #ifdef BOOST_HAVE_BOOST_PREDEF #ifdef BOOST_VERSION // The following translates BOOST_VERSION to a BOOST_VERSION_NUMBER!! // BOOST_VERSION % 100 is the patch level // BOOST_VERSION / 100 % 1000 is the minor version // BOOST_VERSION / 100000 is the major version #define BV BOOST_VERSION #define BVN BOOST_VERSION_NUMBER(BV / 100000,BV / 100 % 1000,BV %100) #define BOOST_VERSION_VERSION BVN #undef BVN #undef BV #endif Other libraries can also construct new version codes. John Fletcher

1 1

Re: [boost] [Boost-testing] DrWeb regression test server is going down
by Beman Dawes 25 Jan '14

25 Jan '14

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Sergey Cheban <s.cheban(a)drweb.com> wrote: > Dear subscribers, > > Unfortunately, DrWeb regression test server (Visual C++ 9-12, Windows > server 2012) is going down. > Sorry to hear that, but thanks for all your past runs! Is this permanent or will it come back up at some point? --Beman

2 1

inter thread communication with message queues
by Kenneth Adam Miller 25 Jan '14

25 Jan '14

I was reading about message queues with respect to inter thread communication, and I have a specific use case that I want to describe. It's rather complex, so I want to be careful that I design it so that there are no race conditions. Pool A is a buffer (of type 1) handle manager, that feeds buffer handles into thread set 1, and receives old handles from thread set 2. There is only one thread running pool A. Thread set 1 is a set of N threads that fill up buffers of type 1 with regular data. It pushes full buffers to thread set 2. Thread set 2 is a set of M threads that compress buffers of type 1 into data buffers of type 2. Once the buffer of type 1 has be used up, it is cleared and sent back to Pool A. It pulls fresh data buffers of type 2 from Pool B, and sends freshly filled compressed buffers to Pool C. Pool C does something with the buffer, clears it and hands it to Pool B. Can this be done safely using an implementation like what I see here: http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk/threading/implementing-a-thread-safe… ? Note 1: -= denotes a 1-to-N connect and =- a N-to-1 connect RR = Request reply relationship +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | | v | Pool A RR Thread Set 1 Router X | PULL-PUSH --==> PULL-read-PUSH ==--> PULL-PUSH --==> PULL Thread Set 2 PUSH \ / +-compress-+ Pool B RR / \ PULL-PUSH --==> PULL PUSH ^ || | || +----------- PUSH-write-PULL <--==++ Pool C Questions: how do I have a separate thread poll on multiple shared message queues? Like, I have a thread pool that both receives requests for buffer handles and that receives old buffer handles to recycle.

2 1

boost condition_variable internals
by Kenneth Adam Miller 25 Jan '14

25 Jan '14

I need to know that boost does not use any kind of locking, mutex or semaphore mechanism within the boost::condition_variable class. I don't know where it is in source, or I would check to make certain. Can someone provide me a yes no verification?

2 1

Re: [boost] Compile time reflection for IPC using
by Brian Wood 25 Jan '14

25 Jan '14

> Ok. I would like to ask you about next > When we should use the RPC architect should we serrialize the call Oleg, Sorry, but I have no idea what you're talking about in your posts. I have some serialization related software on my website that you may be interested in. I'm available to talk on the phone if you like. -- Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust. http://webEbenezer.net

1 0

Announcing the Boost Community Maintenance mailing list
by Marshall Clow 24 Jan '14

24 Jan '14

The Boost Community Maintenance mailing list (boost-maint) has been created, and you can sign up here: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-maint The goal of the Boost Community Maintenance team is to maintain those libraries whose creators no longer can. The initial proposal for the group is here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9897665/community-maintenance.html I will be posting status and working guidelines here and on the boost-maint mailing list over the weekend. I encourage everyone who wishes to participate to subscribe to the boost-maint mailing list, and we’ll get started by Monday. Thanks in advance! -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists@gmail.com> A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait). -- Yu Suzuki

1 0

[testing] How do you interpret the SHA1 revision (outdated results)?
by John Maddock 24 Jan '14

24 Jan '14

So... I'm looking into Boost.Regex and I'm seeing some failures which appear to refer to outdated sources (line numbers are all wrong for current source), for example: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/marshall-ma… But how on earth do I check this? Reported run date is yesterday, but this was fixed/changed on Dec 20th: almost a month ago. And the revision listed on the page is a SHA1 which I can't seem to relate to anything useful? Thanks, John.

6 13

Compile time reflection for IPC using
by Oleg Labutin 24 Jan '14

24 Jan '14

Do you now about one approach (for two compilers (gcc 3.7, and MSVC (last)) emulate compile time reflection with difference scope? Like struct some { META_STRUCT(some); FLD(int, a); FLD(int, b); METH(int, call_0, (int, a)); METH(int, call_1, (int, b)); }; void in() { typedef hl::reflection_extract<some>::field_accessors acc; some s; s.*hl::at<acc, a_accessor>::get() = 5; } We can see here https://github.com/ol72/hl/tree/ And you can try to compile this attached demo Use __J_ACTIVE define to see as reflection worked in json oriented part of project. For which you should install json. Without this you can see ability take meta information by query. But global goal I think we understanding Our backend can be something else. Like client server , data base oriented structures in which we can use by SQL like C++ syntax We can make (and I made it ) database like structures struct human_tables { TABLE(names) { fields((int) index, (std::string) name, .... ); }; TABLE(country) { fields((names_table::index) name, ... ); }; TABLE(human) { indexes(names_table::index_field); fields((names_table::index_field) name, (country_table::index) country...); }; };

3 11

C++03 and C++11 ABI compatibility for compiled libraries
by Andrey Semashev 24 Jan '14

24 Jan '14

Hi, I would like to raise the issue of binary compatibility of compiled Boost libraries between C++03 and C++11. I faced this problem with gcc on Linux, but other compilers and platforms may be affected as well. To summarize the problem: * Most, if not all Linux distributions build packages in C++03 mode. This is also the default in gcc. * Some Boost libraries conditionally use C++11 features in their binary interfaces (see [1] as an example). This makes C++03 and C++11 versions of the library binary incompatible. * Given that, users are unable to use C++11 in their code that uses Boost because of linker failures. I don't have the complete list of the offending C++11 features that break ABI, but it would seem that at least scoped enums and rvalue references are among them. Are there any more? I would like to hear opinions on the possible course of action to tackle this problem. Currently, I see 2 choices: 1. Avoid using C++11 features in binary interfaces. This may also mean avoiding STL types in binary interfaces, if they differ between C++03 and C++11 (I didn't verify that). This is my suggested hotfix solution for Boost.Filesystem [1] and the approach I took in Boost.Log. Obviously, this cripples code and error prone, but it keeps a single binary that can be used from any flavor of C++ on the user's side. 2. Compile different versions of Boost libraries, for each supported C++ version. The C++ version should be encoded into the library file names, so that different versions can coexist. This would require changes in Boost.Build and autolinking support code, but I think this would be a better long-term solution. Opinions? [1] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6779

12 27

Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
by Nat Goodspeed 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

Hi all, The review of Boost.Fiber by Oliver Kowalke begins today, Monday January 6th, and closes Wednesday January 15th. ----------------------------------------------------- About the library: Boost.Fiber provides a framework for micro-/userland-threads (fibers) scheduled cooperatively. The API contains classes and functions to manage and synchronize fibers similar to Boost.Thread. Each fiber has its own stack. A fiber can save the current execution state, including all registers and CPU flags, the instruction pointer, and the stack pointer and later restore this state. The idea is to have multiple execution paths running on a single thread using a sort of cooperative scheduling (versus threads, which are preemptively scheduled). The running fiber decides explicitly when it should yield to allow another fiber to run (context switching). Boost.Fiber internally uses coroutines from Boost.Coroutine; the classes in this library manage, schedule and, when needed, synchronize those coroutines. A context switch between threads usually costs thousands of CPU cycles on x86, compared to a fiber switch with a few hundred cycles. A fiber can only run on a single thread at any point in time. docs: http://olk.github.io/libs/fiber/doc/html/ git: https://github.com/olk/boost-fiber src: http://ok73.ok.funpic.de/boost.fiber.zip The documentation has been moved to another site; see the link above. If you have already downloaded the source, please refresh it; Oliver has added some new material. --------------------------------------------------- Please always state in your review whether you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library! Additionally please consider giving feedback on the following general topics: - What is your evaluation of the design? - What is your evaluation of the implementation? - What is your evaluation of the documentation? - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems? - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? Nat Goodspeed Boost.Fiber Review Manager ________________________________

16 129

Volunteers needed to run regression test reporting
by Beman Dawes 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

We have had a long term problem with regression test reporting going offline unexpectedly. The process used XSLT processing was hard to configure, horribly slow, and very fragile, and those factors made it a pain to run. Last year, Steven Watanabe rewrote the report generation in C++, and those issues have pretty much disappeared, so the process is now far easier to run. It runs in five minutes or less. Hooray C++! Hooray Steven! And Hooray Tom Kent who runs the reports! The remaining reliability factors are local ones like system crashes. Since the reports run as cron jobs, it can be quite a while before anyone is inconvenienced enough to report it to the Boost list, and Murphy's Law ensures that it is always the day after the person running the reports left for a week-long back country hike. We can mitigate that by having several people running the reports. I've written some docs, so it shouldn't be too hard, although right now it does require a *nix-like system. I've been running them on a Windows host using a VirtualBox virtual Ubuntu system, and have found it to be easy. One possibility would be for Tom to continue to run the reports on the hour, a second person to run them twenty minutes after the hour, and a third to run forty minutes after the hour. Please volunteer to help make regression reporting more timely and reliable! --Beman

12 21

[phoenix] 7181
by Fletcher, John P 23 Jan '14

23 Jan '14

________________________________________ From: Boost [boost-bounces(a)lists.boost.org] on behalf of Mathieu Champlon [m.champlon(a)free.fr] Sent: 23 January 2014 12:11 To: boost(a)lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [phoenix] 9111 and 9113 > Hi John, >There is https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7181 which is also >about a warning albeit a different one. >Thanks for doing this ! >MAT. I have pushed to phoenix develop using the patch in 7181 John _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

1 0