- Boost - lists.preview.boost.org

[gsoc2018]Project Proposal for Boost.SafeFloat
by Saga _-_ 21 Mar '18

21 Mar '18

Hi everyone, This is a draft of my proposal for Boost.SafeFloat: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XQRygvTYPXKnWU0MW7XoL5YWJGLpIfIm4VmJVKj… Please take a look at it and share your opinion about how I could improve it. Thanks in advance for your time and effort. Have a nice day Sagar Tewari

1 0

[gsoc2018]Proposal for Boost.SafeFloat
by iaansagar＠gmail.com 20 Mar '18

20 Mar '18

Hi everyone, This is a draft of my proposal for Boost.SafeFloat: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XQRygvTYPXKnWU0MW7XoL5YWJGLpIfIm4VmJVKj… Please take a look at it and share your opinion about how I could improve it. Thanks in advance for your time and effort. Have a nice day Sagar Tewari _____________________________________ Sent from http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com

1 0

[gsoc2018]Proposal for Boost.SafeFloat
by Sagar Tewari 20 Mar '18

20 Mar '18

Hi everyone, This <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XQRygvTYPXKnWU0MW7XoL5YWJGLpIfIm4VmJVKj…> is a draft of my proposal for Boost.SafeFloat as a gsoc project. I'll be very grateful if you could take out some of your time to take a look at it and provide your opinion. Have a nice day Sagar Tewari -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html

1 0

[gsoc2018] Boost.Real project proposal
by Akshay Raut 20 Mar '18

20 Mar '18

Hello community, I had introduced myself earlier also. I have made some minor changes to the proposal I am making for the Boost.Real project. Hope you all take out some of you time to go through the proposal and suggest changes or improvements in the proposal. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1f9WYzX1mSigrmnkjbPKGpLP0-Y0-KTfv Sincerely yours, Akshay Kumar Raut

1 1

C++Now 2018 Program Published
by Jon Kalb 19 Mar '18

19 Mar '18

Boosters, The program has (mostly) been published for C++Now 2018: http://cppnow.org/announcements/2018/03/2018-program-announced/ It promises to be an exciting event. It isn’t too late to decide to join us in Aspen this may: http://cppnow.org/registration/ Jon

1 0

[CircleCI] boostorg's plan has 8 days left on its trial
by Mateusz Loskot 19 Mar '18

19 Mar '18

Hi, I've been working on CircleCI configuration for Boost.GIL, temporarily, in my GitHub fork (mloskot/gil). When I go to https://circleci.com/gh/mloskot/gil/edit#parallel-builds, I see this message: "boostorg's plan has 8 days left on its trial. You may want to try increasing parallelism below to get the most value out of your containers." Could anyone help me to understand why I see this message even if I added the project to CircleCI from my fork and not from boostorg/gil? Does it mean, all boostorg repositories and all their forks share the CircleCI allowances? There is also second message saying "These settings are only for 1.0 builds. To define parallelism for 2.0 jobs" and since I'm developing CircleCI 2.0 setup for Boost.GIL, I assume I can ignore this secong message. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

1 0

[release] 1.67.0 post-beta merges
by Daniel James 19 Mar '18

19 Mar '18

The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See <https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Release-Beta-Merge-Policy>

1 0

[gsoc2018]boost.safefloat and boost.real
by Sagar Tewari 19 Mar '18

19 Mar '18

Hi, I'm interested in working on the Boost.SafeFloat or Boost.Real as a gsoc project. Currently I'm in the process of completing the selection criteria(reading the linked matrial, solving competency test) . I've good experience with coding in C++. I went through the safefloat codebase and documentation and it looks quite interesting. But I'm not sure how I'm supposed to submit the competency test solutions. Do I have to include that with the Gsoc proposal? Can someone inform me about that? Also, the Boost.Real project is under the catagory "GSoC Projects which have been prearranged by students with mentors for 2018". Is this project still open for participent submission? -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html

2 1

[GSoC 2018] A Few Questions about Boost.uBLAS
by philectron 19 Mar '18

19 Mar '18

Hello, I'm interested in working on *Boost.uBLAS* library. *I've fundamentally finished the Programming Competency Test for this project. I'm currently improving it.* I need more information on the following: *1.* Can multiple people who also apply for GSoC work on this same project? *2.* How will I submit my Programming Competency Test? *3.* Has anyone taken this project already? *4.* If 3 = yes, do you allow multiple people working on the same project for GSoC 2018? *5.* If 5 = no, what project should I work on? I have never used or worked with Boost Library before, so I don't know what in Boost Library needs to be improved. What project do you think would be feasible for Thank you! -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html

2 1

[GSoC 2018] Want to contributed to Boost.SafeFloat
by Recolic Keghart 19 Mar '18

19 Mar '18

Dear boost community, I'm Bensong Liu, a second year undergraduate student. I'm interested in Boost.SafeFloat and willing to contribute to this project. I've finished all of the `Programming competency test` and I'm still working on tests && proposal. Then how could I contact my mentor, and how should I submit my solution to tests(https://recolic.net/res/note-deploy-key-for-gsoc.sh)? Thanks for your guidance. Bensong Liu

1 0

[gsoc2018]boost.safefloat and boost.real
by iaansagar＠gmail.com 19 Mar '18

19 Mar '18

Hi, I'm interested in working on the Boost.SafeFloat or Boost.Real as a gsoc project. Currently I'm in the process of completing the selection criteria(reading the linked matrial, solving competency test) . I've good experience with coding in C++. I went through the safefloat codebase and documentation and it looks quite interesting. But I'm not sure how I'm supposed to submit the competency test solutions. Do I have to include that with the Gsoc proposal? Can someone inform me about that? Also, the Boost.Real project is under the catagory "GSoC Projects which have been prearranged by students with mentors for 2018". Is this project still open for participent submission? _____________________________________ Sent from http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com

1 0

[GSoC18] Working on my proposal for the Boost.Real project
by Laouen Belloli 17 Mar '18

17 Mar '18

Hi, I was in contact with Damián Vicino talking about a proposal for the Boost Real project. I posted here <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KwPUioBYy19HM0X9O1e6X6gigOkmzoqZ/view?usp=…> what I got so far, please comment on it if you have some time so I can improve it following your suggestions. I would appreciate very much your opinion as I have no experience writing GSoC proposals. Thanks and Best regards to all, Laouen. -- Laouen Mayal Louan Belloli. LIAA - DC - FCEyN - UBA. C.A.B.A. - Buenos Aires - Argentina. https://liaa.dc.uba.ar +54 9 11 38675694

1 0

regarding proposal
by anant agrawal 17 Mar '18

17 Mar '18

I am Anant Agrawal currently pursuing B.E in computer science had posted the proposal but had not received any response regarding it. Had anyone gone through it.

1 0

[gsoc2018]
by Akshay Raut 16 Mar '18

16 Mar '18

Hello everyone I am Akshay Kumar Raut, a 3rd year undergrad student in Computer Science from India. Please provide feedback and comments on my project proposal on Boost.Real basic operators. Thank you. here is the link : https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TrfYxYHRVFREkLKMqn9b23X3i8dtZ2_q warm regards, Akshay Kumar Raut

1 0

[gsoc18] Mentor Search for Boost.Geometry idea
by Tinko Bartels 16 Mar '18

16 Mar '18

Hi, my name is Tinko Bartels, I'm studying to get a Master's degree in Mathematics at TU Berlin. I'm interested to work on Boost Geometry. I'm working at the university for a couple of years on C++ projects that rely on Boost libraries, most notably Boost.Geometry. Our work involves the computation of exact covers of spaces with boxes. This motivated my idea to add support to void union_(Geometry1 const & geometry1, Geometry2 const & geometry2, Collection & output_collection) void sym_difference(Geometry1 const & geometry1, Geometry2 const & geometry2, Collection & output_collection) void difference(Geometry1 const & geometry1, Geometry2 const & geometry2, Collection & output_collection) for Geometry1=Geometry2=box and Collection is a collection of boxes. Since I have no merged contributions to open source projects to refer to, I could, for example, provide an implementation of the difference method for types adhering to the box concept and a collection of boxes as output_collection. Since the results of those operations in terms of exact covers of the resulting space with boxes are not uniquely defined and the implementation should take less than 3 months, additional strategies for these specializations of the above algorithms could be added as future milestones. If this endeavor is considered worthwhile by potential mentors, I would get started on writing a proposal right away. Kind regards, Tinko Bartels -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html

3 3

Clang on Windows
by Egor Pugin 16 Mar '18

16 Mar '18

Hi, Based on recent news: Clang 6.0.0 is out with very decent support of the latest MSVC STL (15.6). Chrome is built with clang on Windows. So, maybe it is good time to include clang+windows into list of supported configs, setup a CI worker with clang (clang-cl) on Windows? Currently many boost libs already work fine, but some of them require small tweaks like explicit BOOST_USE_WINDOWS_H etc. -- Egor Pugin

8 17

Boost library
by anant agrawal 16 Mar '18

16 Mar '18

I had recently uploaded the draft I would like to make the library more efficient and faster and with a improved functionality. Would like to get the response for a mentor for better guidance

1 0

[release] Boost 1.67.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 2
by Daniel James 16 Mar '18

16 Mar '18

The second release candidates for the 1.67.0 beta release are now available at: <https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.67.0.beta.1/source/> The release notes can be previewed at: <http://www.boost.org/users/history/in_progress.html> The documentation is available at: <http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_67_0_beta1/> The SHA256 checksums are as follows: 154cf490da858fd9c2307bb904b07a42cbe8355ecf99d5477f0d843c6d03cdda boost_1_67_0_b1_rc2.7z 0d854b208fefaeb5837d6c417f505b189275e32d017f6226001fb165a5ac51ed boost_1_67_0_b1_rc2.tar.bz2 6eb3f9ca8db355765f41361e1e26976228f0c2dff400aade8a5e97aec6aa59f4 boost_1_67_0_b1_rc2.tar.gz 678a6459f2517932536ec97297be1de46ea073f2e2ee17ec8397b80aa0953f49 boost_1_67_0_b1_rc2.zip As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

6 8

[gsoc18] sharing of proposal
by vardhan gupta 15 Mar '18

15 Mar '18

Hi, I have shared the 1st draft of my proposal for "adding multicore and GPU computations to uBLAS" through the gsoc portal, but haven't yet gotten any feedback on it. Do I need to share it again on the mailing list too? Regards, Vardhan Gupta

3 3

[qvm] Tait–Bryan/Euler angles implemented for matrices
by Emil Dotchevski 15 Mar '18

15 Mar '18

See: https://boostorg.github.io/qvm/rot_mat.html https://boostorg.github.io/qvm/set_rot_mat.html https://boostorg.github.io/qvm/rotate_mat.html Emil

1 0

[gsoc18] Student proposal reviewing (Internal process)
by madhur4127 14 Mar '18

14 Mar '18

Hi Boost Community, As per Submission template <https://svn.boost.org/trac10/wiki/SoCSubmissionTemplate> a candidate is required to show competency in C++ and must be "genuinely" interested in the project and also in open-source community. Judging of competency is straight forward, but how can interest be judged? Considering myself as example who had just got in serious open source projects(Sophomore Undergraduate). My coding ablilities <https://github.com/madhur4127/Programming-Competency-Test> are not at expert level but I am improving and learning myself while my university teaches knapsack greedy and automaton. Doesn't this gives an idea of interest in open source of a candidate or am I being a sophomore is a disadvantage with respect to other post graduate candidates? I know boost requires serious level work and it has world's most craftiest libraries but does Boost prefer experienced candidates or take chances with candidates genuinely interested in development and are moderately skilled? As per the division rules "A student must be able to write in C++". Regards, Madhur gsoc18 aspirant [Boost.Intrusive] -- Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html

1 0

Re: [boost] [interprocess] file_mutex class proposal
by mateusz janek 14 Mar '18

14 Mar '18

Hey, any thoughts on that? Thanks, Mateusz 2018-03-04 3:42 GMT-08:00 mateusz janek <stryku2393(a)gmail.com>: > Hello boost::interprocess community, > > During my pet projects development I found that a file access > synchronization is a common problem so, I wrote a class that wraps it and > thought that it can be useful for wider community. I would like to ask you > what do you think about such functionality in boost::interprocess? I'm > aware that class from the repo is not ready to release. Just wanted to show > about what functionality I'm talking about. > > Here you can find the repo: https://github.com/stryku/file_mutex > You can find there the proposed class and a simple usage example. > > If you will find it interesting I will prepare more formal merge proposal, > update docs, maybe more examples etc. > > Looking forward to hearing from you what do you think about it. > > Thank you, > Mateusz Janek > >

2 2

[release] Boost 1.67.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1
by Daniel James 14 Mar '18

14 Mar '18

The release candidates for the first 1.67.0 beta release are now available at: <https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.67.0.beta.1/source/> The release notes can be previewed at: <http://www.boost.org/users/history/in_progress.html> The documentation is available at: <http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_67_0_beta1/> The SHA256 checksums are as follows: 3d52af11ea6c45c73e18bf9b386056d31dab5092923cc9ed8efa29a083ffb9de boost_1_67_0_b1_rc1.7z 680336bd9a56dccda359061660348c5656cab71cb76713b157ce9a6f840659f0 boost_1_67_0_b1_rc1.tar.bz2 a4608b3ee0b4fadad7b2a2a9efa7c4ad8ce120ee94232e0ee86796f38cced319 boost_1_67_0_b1_rc1.tar.gz 3d1faa96ddda6f0a864f3292c014420457159f0960ff82efcca9feb898d21c1a boost_1_67_0_b1_rc1.zip As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

11 29

[gsoc18] Boost.Detour & Mentor Search
by Michael Kiros 14 Mar '18

14 Mar '18

Hello, I'm a C++ developer and have been developing in C++ for over 6 years now in my personal time. I wanted to accomplish two things with this post: 1. Propose the idea of boost::detour 2. Find a mentor in the process Boost.Detour is not something new that I'd like to implement but a concept in programming that I have been using for a very long time now and would love to have it easily accessible with the inclusion of a simple <boost/detour.hpp>. The idea is to have function hooking easily accessible to everyone using C++. Though it may seem like a niche feature, function hooking is more commonly used than most people think (e.g. modifying binaries after compilation for feature addition, reverse engineering proprietary software). It's a beautiful concept when you see it working. In the process I need a mentor to guide me through the process of putting down my ideas to paper and implementing them according to the standards that Boost holds. This includes replacing components from my library with Boost concepts (e.g. boost::process). I'm also a student at Texas Tech University studying Computer Science. Can't wait to hear from someone. Michael

2 1

[type_traits] is_list_constructible regression failures
by Lorenzo Caminiti 13 Mar '18

13 Mar '18

Hello all, I noticed the following failure in Boost.TypeTraits regression tests on GCC 4.6 C++11. Any idea why this is failing? http://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/type_traits.html Test output: igaztanaga-master-gcc-4.6c++11 - type_traits - cxx14_aliases_test / gcc-4.6c+ Rev cb62bbf20f4a0000ee6f16835b0c2dc92edea8cd / Sun, 11 Mar 2018 03:16:04 +0000 Compile [2018-03-11 10:15:18 UTC]: fail "C:/Programs/mingw-builds/x32-4.6.4-posix-dwarf-rev0/mingw32/bin/gcc-4.6.bat" -pipe -fmax-errors=1 -std=c++0x -m32 -O0 -fno-inline -Wall -pedantic -Werror -march=i686 -Wextra -Wno-bool-operation -Wno-int-in-bool-context -Wno-uninitialized -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -I".." -I"..\libs\type_traits\test\libs\tt2\light\include" -c -o "c:\boost\master\results\boost\bin.v2\libs\type_traits\test\cxx14_aliases_test.test\gcc-4.6c+\dbg\dbg-symbl-off\cxx14_aliases_test.o" "..\libs\type_traits\test\cxx14_aliases_test.cpp" In file included from ../boost/type_traits.hpp:110:0, from ..\libs\type_traits\test\cxx14_aliases_test.cpp:10: ../boost/type_traits/is_list_constructible.hpp:36:61: error: expected class-name before 'decltype' compilation terminated due to -fmax-errors=1. I am asking because a couple of Boost.Contract tests that #include <boost/type_traits.hpp> fail with the same Boost.TypeTraits error on this compiler. Thanks. --Lorenzo

3 4